Untitled Page

Industry

Stubbing out Smoke Breaks

By By A.E. Smith
June 1, 2006

View Comments
Smokers at lawn-care company Scotts Miracle-Gro are nearing their last pack. In October, employees at the Marysville, Ohio, headquarters will be subject to an aggressive smoke-free policy that says employees who smoke, even when not at work, can lose their jobs.

After spending extensive funds on initiatives that encourage employees to lead healthier lifestyles—including a $5 million onsite fitness and medical facility—CEO Jim Hagedorn decided that keeping smokers on the payroll undermined that investment. "We're not making a personal judgment about people who smoke," says spokesman Jim King. "But we're not going to underwrite the risk associated with it."

(article continued below)
LAUNCH ARTICLES
Perks at the Pump Offering relief to employees.

Good Call: Putting service first.

Stubbing Out Smoke Breaks: Calling on employees to kick the habit.

Hot Product: Put your corporate logo on a bottle of your favorite wine.

Survey Says: Supermarkets are top shelf among consumers.

Quick Study: Hershey's and eBay team up and turn trash to treasure.

Games Women Play: Female-targeted advergames reflect popularity of gaming among women.

Survey Says: What CMOs Want.

Legal Lesson: One company's costly hazing scandal.

Face Forward: Revlon supplies cosmetic counter salespeople with new sales tool.

Industry Deals: Maritz divests its European arm, while Carlson Wagonlit gobbles up Navigant.

Survey Says: Promotional products continue growth.


Many companies facing continued increases in health care costs may be thinking the same thing. The Centers for Disease Control estimates that smoking-related medical expenses cost the nation upwards of $75 billion annually between 1997 and 2001. Studies have also shown that smokers take more days off and are less productive than their nonsmoking colleagues. In response, some employers, like JPMorgan Chase and publisher Gannett Company, now charge smokers higher health insurance premiums, and many more have forbidden smoking on their premises.

Employers who consider following Scotts' lead should be aware that the legal ground for such provisions is uneven. Although smokers are not protected nationally under the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), many individual states, like New York and New Jersey, have statutes protecting them from discrimination. And because ADA prohibits employers from requiring medical examinations that are not directly job-related, it may prove illegal to enforce policies by mandating nicotine testing. Scotts is still working out its enforcement strategy.

Jonathan Segal, a Philadelphia–based employment lawyer, cautions that such policies, even when legal, can prove damaging to employee relations. Far more safe, he advises, is for companies to use the carrot approach, by offering voluntary smoking-cessation programs and rewarding all nonsmokers with a discount on health insurance.


Write a letter to the Editor about this story.
This page is protected by Copyright laws. Do Not Copy

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Member Login

Username
Password
Remember me on this computer
Forgot your username or password?

Not a Member?

Sign up today to enjoy these great benefits:
  • Comment on articles
  • Build customized client postcards
  • Build customized client brochures
  • Post photo tours/videos

Register